Tuesday, October 31, 2006

Log, or "Log?"


According to SiteMeter 37% of visitors to the LogBlog think it refers the colloquial usage of the word log: fecal matter, turds or poo, rather than the intended longish rough pieces of wood cut (or fallen) from trees.

Nearly 21% of visitors expect a scatological or fecal fetish site of some kind, a site such as THIS or THIS, or THIS.

And 11% come to the Logblog specifically for that purpose, hoping to find something like THIS, or THIS, or THIS or even THIS.

LogBlog is in no way is associated with this content, and regrets the confusion between this Log Community and sites like THIS, and THIS and THIS.

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

I think you've crossed the line this time, Logblogman.

Sesen said...

hi

would you like to exchange link?

thanks

jana said...

...

Eww...

lillie said...

hi would you be linked on my blog??

Anonymous said...

I'm worried about some of these comments.

I dont think these are all normal log enthusiasts, sharing their thoughts with the Logblog Community.

I get the feeling they're trying to sell something.

Like, what's with the online maogic guy?

Anonymous said...

I remember poo.

(Faraway look in my eyes)

me said...

i have to go potty now

one good thing about log poo is you can whittle it into crafts after it dries.

see you in a couple hours!

AKI SYSTEMS 2600 said...

hmn, interesting data. never heard that term "scat" either. there is much to learn here on blog of logs.